Mark Zabilowicz, Tampa Fl Realtor

We Sell More Because We Do More...
Welcome to Mark Zabilowicz, Tampa Fl Realtor Sign in | Help

Florida Homeowners Insurance

  • Senate passes property insurance measure

    Legislation that gives Florida regulators more authority over private property insurance companies sailed through the Senate on Wednesday, escalating the state’s ongoing battle with insurers.

    Senators voted to end a practice of companies being able to increase customers’ rates before final state approval. The practice allows companies to start charging higher rates and then seek approval of the increase. If it’s denied, they have to refund the money, albeit not with interest.

    The Senate bill (SB 2860) would also require that home and business owners’ claims are paid within 90 days if the company does not dispute the claim.

    It also eliminates a loophole that allowed some companies to use models not approved by the state in setting their rates.

    The measure also increases daily fines from $2,500 to $25,000 when companies fail to comply with the state’s insurance regulations.

    “Before, the fines were almost meaningless,” said Sen. Bill Posey, a Rockledge Republican who chairs the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee. “It was more like swatting. Now it’s more like spanking.”

    The legislation also takes $250 million from Citizen’s Property Insurance, the state-backed company, and makes it available as incentive money for new companies to take some of Citizens’ customers to reduce the state’s risk over time.

    However, there is no exact companion measure in the House, which is considering two bills (HB 5003 and HB 5057) that are more industry friendly. The differences would have to be worked out before anything could go to Gov. Charlie Crist, who favors the Senate measure, which passed 32-7.

    “I hope the House now will also see the importance of this legislation for Florida consumers and how it will enable my office to continue to ensure that companies are keeping insurance available and affordable,” Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty said Wednesday after the Senate bill passed.

    Florida expanded its Hurricane Catastrophe Fund to $28 billion last year with the intention of making reinsurance available at a lower cost, with the goal of lowering premiums for consumers.

    But fewer than one in five Floridians have seen lower rates, infuriating many lawmakers and Crist, who made lower taxes and lower insurance rates the centerpiece of his successful 2006 campaign.

    Since lawmakers passed the bill last year with the intent of lowering rates, the Office of Insurance Regulation has denied dozens of requests by private companies for rate increases.

    McCarty suspended Allstate from doing business in the state three months ago, but their agents have been allowed to keep writing new business while the dispute winds through the court system.

    Private insurers began re-evaluating their business practices in Florida following Hurricane Andrew in 1992. The devastating back-to-back seasons of 2004-2005 made the problem even bigger. Allstate, for example, has dropped roughly 400,000 homeowners policies in the state in recent years.

    Meanwhile, the state remains on the hook if it’s hit by a major hurricane this summer.

    “The real crisis is whether Citizens, the CAT Fund and private insurers can timely pay claims after a major hurricane this year,” said Sam Miller, executive vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, an industry group. “Nothing in the Senate bill addresses that.”

    Industry representatives believe lawmakers should be more concerned with Citizens, the state-backed company that now carries more than 1.25 million policies – far more than any of the private insurers.

    Citizens has legislative authority to charge below-market rates, but would make up a shortage by assessing its policyholders, and in a catastrophic event everyone in Florida with an insurance policy whether it be homes, businesses, cars or boats would be charged.

    Tampa Fl real estate

  • Special panel to review issues with property insurers

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – Jan. 23, 2008 – The insurance industry should not be allowed to thumb its nose at regulators and lawmakers, an expert told a Senate panel Tuesday.

    J. Robert Hunter, an actuary who has spent 45 years in the business, testified there was no doubt rates would be a significantly higher in Florida if the Legislature had not passed a bill (HB 1A) a year ago providing cheaper reinsurance for companies.

    But Hunter said some large national companies have not complied yet with the new insurance law designed to give consumers a break on their rates.

    “From an actuarial view, they didn’t do what they should’ve done,” said Hunter, who now works for the Consumer Federation of America. “You can’t let a regulated industry thumb their nose at the regulators and the Legislature.”

    He testified for more than two hours Tuesday before the Select Committee on Property Insurance Accountability.

    Sam Miller, vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, an industry group, said no company has tried to avoid the new law although several have had rate filings rejected.

    Just last week, state regulators suspended Allstate’s 10 companies from doing any business in Florida although a court injunction has allowed the company to continue writing policies until the issue is resolved.

    And another round in the state’s tug-of-war with the industry in an election year is just two weeks away.

    The select committee has invited top executives from five companies to testify Feb. 4 and 5 on why savings from cheaper reinsurance have not resulted in lower premiums for consumers.

    One industry economist said companies still have a $6.2 billion deficit from its Florida operations dating back to Hurricane Andrew in 1992.

    Bob Hartwig of the Insurance Information Institute said Florida insurance companies have lost $6.7 billion dollars since 2004, despite two years without hurricanes.

    “It’s very easy right now to demonize insurance companies,” added William Stander, regional manager for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “There are a lot of small business people here ... and some of them are insurance companies. How would some of those who were not insurance companies feel if the state was essentially trying to run them out of business?”

    The new Senate committee, created earlier this month and comprised of 20 of the Senate’s 40 members, is co-chaired by Sen. Steve Geller, D-Cooper City and Sen. Jeff Atwater, R-North Palm Beach

    Tampa Fl Real Estate, Tampa Luxury Homes

     

  • Insurance reform’s ‘what-ifs’ sinking in

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Feb. 1, 2007 – Insurance reform legislation that passed last week shows what’s possible when lawmakers seek “ideas that help Floridians,” Gov. Charlie Crist said in a weekly newsletter sent to supporters.

    “Help for the people of Florida is on the way! Help is on the way in the form of lower homeowners insurance rates for every Floridian,” Crist wrote Friday.

    And it might work, too, unless the state gets hit by a strong hurricane in the next few years.

    “We are screwed if that occurs,” said Senate Democratic Leader Steve Geller of Cooper City, one of the plan’s architects.

    A few worst-case scenarios are tempering some of the enthusiasm over what Crist and others bill as a bipartisan triumph:

    • What if Florida gets hit by a costly storm before it can build up a bigger, new public catastrophe fund, designed to lower premiums by relieving insurers of some risk?
    • What if new rules against “cherry picking,” the practice of offering the most profitable types of insurance but not property insurance, send automobile insurers packing from Florida?
    • What if a bulked-up Citizens Property Insurance Corp., the public insurer of last resort that’s now empowered to offer other types of insurance, steals customers from private businesses? 

    Crist even added his own scenario, which he plans to address at a Cabinet meeting this morning: What if private insurers try to rush through rate increases now, while the reform plan is being implemented?

    Crist has an answer for that one: offer an emergency ruling to prohibit policy cancellations and require rate changes to incorporate the new legislation.

    Precarious ground

    Insurance industry officials accept the reforms as a political reality but caution they put state finances on precarious ground.

    The eight storms that hit Florida in 2004-05 created $36 billion in insurance claims. Insurers warn this could be a drop in the bucket if the right storm hits the wrong part of Florida.

    They insist that Citizens’ premiums are irresponsibly low and won’t be able to cover all of its claims in a future storm. That could lead to another taxpayer-financed bailout such as the one approved in 2006 and more assessments on all insurance policies.

    Floridians would also be hit with huge assessments on their property, auto and other insurance policies to cover any damages charged to the newly expanded public catastrophe fund.

    Private insurers are responsible for the first $6 billion of payouts in a storm under the new reforms. The state’s catastrophe fund covers the next $16 billion. If additional claims remain, as in an especially powerful hurricane, a second tier of the public catastrophe fund covers the next $20 billion in losses. The state would have to issue bonds to finance all of that.

    The goal is to save private insurance companies the expense of buying “reinsurance,” a form of institutional protection that spreads the risk of damages. This is an expense passed on to customers through their premiums.

    A state fund, theoretically, can do it more cheaply than private insurance companies because it isn’t taxed and has no profit motive. Insurers who buy this lower-cost state coverage must pass the savings to consumers.  The catastrophic fund now has less than $2 billion.

    No one disputes the cost estimates. But advocates of the reforms say Floridians were going to pick up the tab under the old system, too. Skyrocketing premiums and sharp increases in property taxes were starting to crimp the Florida economy, said Bill Newton, executive director of the Florida Consumer Action Network.

    “People had to have rate relief,” he said. “The shock to folks was more than people could bear.”

    Meanwhile, Citizens spokesman Rocky Scott acknowledges that some customers may seek coverage by the state-run insurer now that it can offer lower rates and insure other perils for less than the private companies they now use.  But Scott dismissed talk that the state might aggressively pursue the new business.

    “We don’t have a sales force,” Scott said. “That would be hard for us to do. We don’t have agents. We’re not out there marketing.”

    Citizens must file a business plan by March 1 detailing how it intends to bulk up its staff and apply the new latitude.

    But homeowners will flock to Citizens with or without a sales force once they learn it may have cheaper premiums, State Farm spokesman Chris Neal said. Although Citizens was created to be a last resort, he predicted a migration from private insurance customers to the state.

    “I’m just afraid what we’re seeing is the beginning of the end of the private maker, and everybody’s going to end up in Citizens,” Neal said.

    Fewer concerns are being raised about a possible exodus of automobile insurers as a result of the “cherry picking” provisions. Companies selling automobile insurance in Florida now must offer property insurance, too, if they provide it in other states.

    So far, no one has threatened to leave the state, Miller said. The new provision might discourage new companies from offering policies in Florida, Miller and Neal said.

    Legislator criticizes changes

    Nothing that passed last week encourages insurance companies to come to Florida or companies here to offer more policies, said state Rep. Dennis Ross, a Lakeland Republican and an insurance agent.

    Encouraging such behavior is the only way to create long-term rate stability, Ross said.

    It would have been better to offer subsidies to Floridians who couldn’t afford insurance premiums than to put the entire state on the hook if the state gets walloped, he said.

    Ross was one of two legislators to vote against the reform bill. As a result, he was forced to resign last week from a House leadership post.

    “I think time will prove me right,” Ross said. “There’s no question in my mind, I would not have been so steadfast in my opinion if I did not believe we would be the recipients of more storms for a prolonged period of time.”
     

    Copyright © 2007 Tampa Tribune, Fla., Michael Fechter. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News. Tampa Tribune, Fla.

    For more please visit www.Homes4UinTampa.com

  • Emergency insurance ruling looks to be retroactive

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Feb. 8, 2007 – An emergency rule issued last week that freezes homeowner insurance rates and prevents policy cancellations or non-renewals through May 1 looks be to retroactive, halting previously announced plans by some insurers to pare the number of policies on their books.

    Most immediately affected is Allstate Floridian, which had announced in early January that it would begin non-renewing 106,000 policies by April 1.

    Late Wednesday, the Office of Insurance Regulation issued letters clarifying the emergency rule that was signed by Gov. Charlie Crist and approved by the Florida Cabinet.

    The OIR letters state no rate hikes, policy cancellations or non-renewals are allowed during the 90-day period ending May 1. Actions announced before the rule and effective during the freeze period, like Allstate’s, are also barred.

    The letters also say insurers aren’t allowed to issue new cancellations or non-renewals until they make new rates taking into consideration how much they will lower rates after buying lower-cost reinsurance from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. The lower-cost reinsurance was made available through a massive insurance reform bill passed by the state Legislature during a special session last month.

    One company, American Strategic Insurance in St. Petersburg, has gone ahead with this filing. It will lower its hurricane base rates “a uniform 20 percent,” resulting in a statewide average drop of 11.5 percent. That’s because the company saved $27.4 million on its reinsurance expense after it bought its coverage from the catastrophe fund for the coming hurricane season.

    In its filing, the firm said if regulators expand the catastrophe fund by an additional $4 billion, its savings would grow to $31.5 million and allow for an additional 1.8 percent cut in its rates.

    American Strategic has 151,000 policies in Florida. It wants to implement the rate cut as soon as March 1. “We are getting inundated with phone calls from policyholders asking when their rates will be reduced,” said Kevin Milkey, American Strategic’s executive vice president in the filing.

    Allstate, in the meantime, is wrestling with the impact of the emergency rule.

    Ryan Priest, an Allstate spokesman, said the firm is still trying to figure out the full meaning of the rule and OIR’s clarifications.

    “We fully intend to fully comply with the rule signed by the governor and OIR,” said Priest.

    The company had no immediate answer on what will happen to policyholders like Irving and Willa Ingwer, who received a non-renewal notice on their condo policy effective April 1. The couple is wondering whether Allstate will have to renew their policy for another year.

    “We’re trying to figure out what it means for these policies,” added Priest.

    The new insurance law also nips Allstate’s non-renewal plans in another way. It doesn’t allow policy cancellations or non-renewals during the hurricane season. This provision hampers Allstate’s most recent slate of non-renewals as the 120,000 policy non-renewals it began in November. Those non-renewals were announced by the company last May.

    Allstate has arranged for Royal Palm Insurance, a newly formed company, to offer its policyholders new coverage as the policies came up for non-renewals.

    In another insurance development, a class-action lawsuit was filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court against Citizens Property Insurance, alleging the state-run insurer failed to properly adjust claims for window damage from Hurricane Wilma.

    The suit claims that Citizens ignored building code provisions that require damaged or destroyed windows be replaced by impact-resistant windows or regular windows and hurricane shutters.

    Paul Berger, the Boca Raton attorney who filed the lawsuit, said Citizens’ policyholders in Miami-Dade and Broward counties were underpaid because the company only paid to replace their damaged windows with simple glass. These homeowners are now at risk should another major storm strike South Florida, he added.

    Rocky Scott, Citizens’ spokesman, said the company couldn’t comment on the lawsuit because it still hasn’t been served.
     

    © 2007 Miami Herald, Beatrice E. Garcia.

    for more information visit www.Homes4UinTampa.com

  • New insurance law suddenly makes Citizens an attractive option

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Feb. 7, 2007 – Citizens Property Insurance, cursed and dreaded since its inception, is becoming the lowest-cost coverage option for some homeowners.

    The massive insurance reform bill that was passed last month allows homeowners covered by a private carrier to opt into Citizens if they’re paying rates 25 percent higher than what the state-run insurer charges.

    And, under a ruling last fall that’s now in the law, Citizens customers don’t have to leave if they receive a notice transferring coverage to a private insurer that wants to hit them with a 25 percent or higher increase.

    Steven Tate of Palmetto Bay, a Florida Peninsula policyholder, got a notice that his premium would jump from $3,200 to $9,000. Mitigation credits could save Tate about $2,000, but he already has two agents shopping Citizens for him.

    “I’m sure there are a lot of people in the same situation as I am, who can’t pay this kind of money for insurance,” Tate said.

    Citizens could end up with 700,000 more policies, according to the Office of Insurance Regulation, and agents all over Broward and Miami-Dade are fielding queries like Tate’s.

    Gov. Charlie Crist was so adamant that the Citizens option be given to more policyholders that excluding that provision could have killed the insurance bill.

    The 25 percent rate threshold, which the governor opposed, was passed as a compromise because some lawmakers were concerned about what a surge of new policies would do to Citizens operations.

    “My indigestion with expanding Citizens has to do more with its quality of service than with its ability to lower rates,” says Rep. Dan Gelber, a Democrat from Miami Beach and House minority leader. He noted that Citizens was besieged with complaints about poor claims handling after the four 2004 storms.

    Based on data from the insurance department, six companies have approved rates that on average are at least 25 percent higher than Citizens.

    Eight other companies with rates at least 25 percent higher than Citizens – many of them at first formed solely to take Citizens policies – took advantage of a state law that allows insurers to begin charging a higher rate and then file for regulatory approval. If the increases are rejected entirely or partially, homeowners would be due a refund.

    Since a ruling last fall, Citizens policyholders who got takeout offers from these firms could refuse to leave Citizens if the rates were 25 percent above what the state-run company was charging. The new law lets policyholders continue to do that and also lets anyone whose rates have climbed beyond the 25 percent-higher mark to join Citizens.

    “It’s a bit of a sea change” for Citizens, says Bob Lotane, an insurance department spokesman, noting that Citizens is no longer just the insurer of last resort.

    Indeed, the new legislation drops the requirement that Citizens peg its rates above the average charged by the 20 largest private insurers in the state.

    Citizens also will be able to sell an entire policy, including windstorm, fire, theft and liability to homeowners in the state’s designated wind-pool area (generally east of I-95 and U.S. 1 in South Florida). The company must submit a business plan to state officials before it may proceed with that.

    Citizens officials say the insurer will be able to handle the heavier policy load.

    “Would this be an unexpected hardship? Hardly,” said Citizens spokesman Rocky Scott. “If they all came crashing in at one time, that would give us a problem. But policies renew once a year.”

    Citizens officials say they don’t expect every policyholder to take the option. For one thing, some homeowners prefer to bundle auto, home, life and health insurance with one firm.

    As it now stands, Citizens processed 55,000 new policies in January – just under 14,000 a week. In January 2006, the company lost 32,000 policies.

    In the past 12 months, Citizens’ exposure has doubled to $418 billion from $209 billion. And with 1.3 million policies on its books, Citizens now stands as the largest insurer of homes and condos in Florida. State Farm Insurance, with a million policies, is the largest private insurer.

    Despite changes to Citizens operations brought about by the reform bill, agents realize a state-run insurance pool isn’t the sole answer to Florida’s insurance crisis.

    Dulce Suarez-Resnick, an agent with HBA Insurance Group in Miami, said the just-passed “Band-Aid legislation” addresses affordability, but it does little about availability.

    “How do we get these national companies, A-rated admitted carriers, back in the game? I haven’t heard a word from any of them. Have you?”

    Copyright © 2007 The Miami Herald, Beatrice E. Garcia. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News.

    For nore information please visit www.Homes4UinTampa.com

  • $50K homestead exemption wouldn’t cover all property taxes

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Feb. 7, 2007 – Gov. Charlie Crist’s promise to slash property taxes for beleaguered homeowners would apply to only about two-thirds of the taxes most homeowners pay, top aides told legislators Tuesday, igniting criticism from Democrats that the tax-cut plan could be a “bait and switch.”

    The governor’s push to double the homestead exemption – from its current $25,000 level to $50,000 – would exclude the property taxes that pay for schools, water management districts and special taxing districts. Translation: If you own a $300,000 home, it would be worth $275,000 when you pay your school taxes, but it would be worth $250,000 when you pay city or county taxes.

    Crist announced last week that he could call for a special election this year to ask voters to approve a series of property tax changes – including increasing the tax break now given to Florida residents who own their home.

    But details of the plan were sketchy and, on Tuesday, the governor’s education budget chief told lawmakers that Crist did not plan to have the homestead exemption apply to all property taxes, only a segment of them that would save homeowners $1 billion a year.

    “Gov. Crist is interested in providing savings for our citizens,” said Vivian Myrtetus, a spokeswoman for Crist. “Homeowners are looking at a potential billion-dollar savings in taxes from doubling their homestead exemption.”

    But the savings under a scaled-back homestead exemption plan would not be as dramatic. School taxes alone usually account for as much as a third of the tax bill.

    In recent years, lawmakers have used growing property values at the local level to boost the amount of money that goes into schools. During the time Jeb Bush was governor, the state’s overall share of school funding declined while the share paid by local taxpayers increased from 38 percent to 45 percent.

    In his budget proposal sent to legislators last week, Crist did recommend a slight cut in school property taxes.

    But House Democratic Leader Dan Gelber said shifting the school funding burden onto homeowners has resulted in a property tax crisis that is now proving difficult to repair.

    “Florida has been conducting a bait and switch on homeowners for decades, and now we’re just seeing it at a higher level,” said Gelber, a Miami Beach Democrat. “This year, if all we do is lower property taxes and increase funding on homeowners, we’re perpetuating the bait and switch all over again.”

    School districts have warned since last summer, when Crist first advocated doubling the homestead exemption, that it could have devastating results on funding for education. Plus, they said it could run afoul of another promise in the Constitution that each child in Florida deserves the same level of education regardless of where he or she lives.

    Republican legislative leaders have embraced the idea of asking voters to alter the state’s property tax scheme but were cautious Tuesday when asked if they favor Crist’s latest proposal.

    Senate leaders, who are conducting town hall meetings across the state to gather public input on the issue, declined to comment on the evolution in Crist’s plan.
     
    “We’re going to hash it out,” said Sen. Mike Haridopolos, R-Melbourne. 

    Rep. Joe Pickens, the Palatka Republican in charge of the House committee that draws up Florida’s school budget, said he remains concerned about the financial impact that doubling the homestead exemption would have on schools, cities and counties.

    Pickens said one option he may propose is to have part of the homestead exemption apply only to homes worth more than $75,000 – a decision that would help many rural counties in North Florida, where property values haven’t soared like they have in South Florida. Pickens also said there is a likelihood that House Republicans will propose a reduction in school property taxes for the coming year regardless of what happens with the homestead exemption.
     

    Copyright © 2007 The Miami Herald, Gary Fineout. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News. Miami Herald staff writers Marc Caputo and Mary Ellen Klas contributed to this report.

     

    For more informatio please visit www.Homes4UinTampa.com